Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded for the allegations therefore they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority to the civil servant without the actual length of service nearly violates all the service structure as being a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming these benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher grade, which is neither the intention from the law nor of your equity. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents on the boy or Female usually do not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they could do if they could Minimize off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by legislation.

The lots of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made very clear that police is free to get action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-industry duties during the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as check here well as private respondents and will consider care of many of the facets of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Generally speaking, higher courts never have direct oversight over the decrease courts of record, in that they cannot achieve out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the reduce courts.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden given to any reported judgment may possibly rely on the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[seven]

However it truly is made clear that police is free to acquire action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused on the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also ensure regard in the family lose in accordance with law and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security on the house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been achieved. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated above. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of your boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf in the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for a dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all performing in their Work opportunities with DCFS.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.

This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are the opinions that are filed about the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and are often not the court's final opinion.

The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to the tradition that the reader should have the ability to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[four]

Because of their position between the two main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of law.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It's also a very well-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.